Basic idea is - current cosmological changes may be reflected in any atom. At any given cosmic time, ‘Hubble length’ can be considered as the gravitational or electromagnetic interaction range. Some cosmologists use the term ‘Hubble volume’ to refer to the volume of the observable universe. With reference to the Mach’s principle and Hubble volume, at any cosmic time, if ‘Hubble mass’ is the product of cosmic ‘critical density’ and the ‘Hubble volume’, then it can be suggested that, each and every point in the free space is influenced by the Hubble mass. Clearly speaking, with Hubble volume and Hubble mass: quantum physics, nuclear physics and cosmic physics can be studied in a unified manner. In this new direction authors noticed some interesting coincidences. With reference to the present atomic and nuclear physical constants, present value of Hubble’s constant is close to (69.5 to 71) km/sec/Mpc. With reference to the microscopic coincidences it is possible to suggest that, current cosmic expansion is saturated and is being stopped by the microscopic physical constants.
| Published in | International Journal of High Energy Physics (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12 |
| Page(s) | 18-37 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hubble Length, Hubble Volume, Mach’s Principle, Fine Structure Ratio, Avogadro Number, Four Cosmological Interactions , SUSY
| [1] | Paul Perlmutter, Supernovae, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe, American Institute of Physics, Physics Today, pp53-60, April 2003. |
| [2] | Hubble E. P, A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae, PNAS, 1929, vol. 15, 1929, pp.168-173. |
| [3] | Hubble, E.P, The 200-inch telescope and some problems it may solve. PASP, 59, pp153-167, 1947. |
| [4] | Bruno Leibundgut and Jesper Sollerman . A cosmological surprise: the universe accelerates. Europhysics News (2001) Vol. 32 No. 4 |
| [5] | P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra (2003). The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (2): 559-606 |
| [6] | Joshua Frieman, Michael Turner and Dragan Huterer, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.46: pp385-432, 2008. |
| [7] | Mustapha Ishak, Remarks on the Formulation of the Cosmological Constant/Dark Energy Problems, Found Phys, 37,pp1470–1498, 2007. |
| [8] | J. W. Moffat, Modified Gravity Or Dark Matter? Online Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1935v2 |
| [9] | Narlikar,J.V, Vishwakarma,R.G. and Burbidge.G., Interpretations of the Accelerating Universe, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Volume 114, Issue 800, pp. 1092-1096, 2002. |
| [10] | R. G. Vishwakarma and J. V. Narlikar, Modeling repulsive gravity with creation, J. Astrophys. Astr.vol- 28, pp17–27, 2007. |
| [11] | Arman Shafielooa, Varun Sahnib and Alexei A. Starobinsky, Is cosmic acceleration slowing down? Phys. Rev. D 80, pp101301, 2009. |
| [12] | David Gross, Einstein and the search for Unification. Current science, Vol. 89, No. 12, 25 Dec 2005. |
| [13] | Narlikar J.V. Direct Particle Formulation of Mach's Principle. Einstein Studies, vol. 6: Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity, pp. 250-261, 1995 Birkhauser Boston, Inc. Printed in the United States |
| [14] | P. A. M. Dirac. The cosmological constants. Nature, 139, 323, 1937. |
| [15] | P. A. M. Dirac. A new basis for cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 165, 199, 1938 |
| [16] | C. L. Bennett et al, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results. Submitted to Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5225v1. |
| [17] | J. Huchara. Estimates of the Hubble Constant, 2010. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. http://hubble.plot.dat |
| [18] | W. L. Freedman et al. Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant. The Astrophysical Journal 553 (1): 47-72. 2001. |
| [19] | J. Beringer et al. Particle Data Group. Phys. Rev. D86, 010001 (2012) |
| [20] | P. J. Mohr and B.N. Taylor, CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants.2007. http://physics.nist.gov/constants. |
| [21] | Geiger H and Marsden E. On a diffuse reaction of the particles. Proc. Roy. Soc., Ser. A 82: 495-500, 1909. |
| [22] | H. Yukawa. On the Interaction of Elementary Particles. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jap. 17 (48). 1935 |
| [23] | .Michael O. Distler et al. The RMS Charge Radius of the Proton and Zemach Moments. Phys. Lett.B. 696: 343-347,2011 |
| [24] | Schwarz, John H.. Introduction to Superstring Theory. arXiv:hep-ex/0008017. Lectures presented at the St. Croix NATO Advanced Study Institute on Techniques and Concepts of High Energy Physics. |
| [25] | J.K. Webb et al. Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant. Physical Review letters, 107 (19) 2011 |
| [26] | Michael J. Longo, Detection of a Dipole in the Handedness of Spiral Galaxies with Redshifts z ~ 0.04, Phys. Lett. B 699, 224-229 .2011 |
| [27] | S.-C. Su and M.-C. Chu. Is the universe rotating? Astrophysical Journal, 703 354. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/354. |
| [28] | Sidharth,B.G.. Is the Universe Rotating? Prespacetime |
| [29] | Journal. October 2010, Vol. 1, Issue 7, pp. 1168-1173. |
| [30] | E. Kajari et al. Rotation in relativity and the propagation of light. Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi", Course CLXVIII, pp. 45-148 (2009) |
| [31] | Istvan Nemeti et al. Visualizing ideas about Godel-type rotating universes. Godel-type Spacetimes: History and New Developments. www.math-inst.hu/pub/algebraic-logic/godunivisu-revised.pdf (2009) |
| [32] | Marcelo Samuel Berman. A General Relativistic Rotating Evolutionary Universe. Astrophys. Space Sci.314:319-321,2008 |
| [33] | G. Chapline et al. Tommy Gold Revisited: Why Does Not The Universe Rotate? AIP Conf.Proc.822:160-165, 2006. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509230. |
| [34] | Robert V Gentry. New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without The F-L Paradigm. CERN preprint, EXT-2003-022, 14 Apr 2003. |
| [35] | Kurt Godel. Rotating Universes in General Relativity Theory. Proceedings of the international Congress of Mathematicians in Cambridge, 1: 175-81, 1950. |
| [36] | Dmitri Rabounski. On the Speed of Rotation of Isotropic Space: Insight into the Redshift Problem. The Abraham Zelmanov Journal, Vol. 2, 2009, 208-223. |
| [37] | Mauro Dorato. On becoming cosmic time and rotating universes. Time, Reality and Experience (provisional title), Royal Institute of Philosophy Series, Cambridge University Press, 2001. |
| [38] | Yuri N. Obukhov. On physical foundations and observational effects of cosmic Rotation. Published in Colloquium on Cosmic Rotation, Eds M. Scherfner, T. Chrobok and M. Shefaat (Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag: Berlin, 2000) pp. 23-96. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0008106v1,7August 2000. |
| [39] | Hawking S.W. A Brief History of Time. Book. Bantam Dell Publishing Group. 1988 |
| [40] | Abdus Salam. Strong Interactions, Gravitation and Cosmology. Publ. in: NATO Advanced Study Institute, Erice, June16-July 6, 1972 . |
| [41] | Salam A, Sivaram C. Strong Gravity Approach to QCD and Confinement. Mod. Phys. Lett., 1993, v. A8(4), 321-326. |
| [42] | Recami E. Elementary Particles as Micro-Universes, and “Strong Black-holes”: A Bi-Scale Approach to Gravitational and Strong Interactions. Preprint NSF-ITP-02-94. posted in the arXives as the e-print physics/0505149, and references therein. |
| [43] | S. Chandrasekhar, Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science, University of Chicago Press, 1987, pages 153-154. |
| [44] | Schwarzschild K. On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory. Sitz. der Koniglich Preuss. Akad. der Wiss, 1916, v. 1, 189-196. |
| [45] | Roger Penrose. Chandrasekhar, Black Holes, and Singularities. J. Astrophys. Astr. (1996) 17, 213–231 |
| [46] | B. J. Carr. Primordial Black Holes: Do They Exist and Are They Useful? Proceedings of ``Inflating Horizon of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology'', Universal Academy Press Inc and Yamada Science Foundation (2005). |
| [47] | Eun-Joo Ahn and Marco Cavaglia. Cosmic black holes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, Volume: 12, Issue: 9(2003) pp. 1699-1704. |
| [48] | Nikodem J. Popławski, Radial motion into an Einstein-Rosen bridge. Physics Letters B. Volume 687, Issues 2-3, 12 April 2010, p 110-113 |
| [49] | Tianxi Zhang. Cosmic microwave background radiation of black hole universe. Astrophysics and Space Science Vol 330, No 1, November 2010, pp. 157-165 |
| [50] | R. K. Pathria, The Universe as a Black Hole, Nature 240, 298-299 (1 December 1972). |
| [51] | Hawking S.W. Black Holes and Baby Universes and Other Essays, (Bantam Books 1993) |
| [52] | Thorne. Kip, Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy, W. W. Norton & Company; Reprint edition, January 1, 1995. |
| [53] | B. D. Simmons et al. Galaxy Zoo: bulgeless galaxies with growing black holes. MNRAS (2013) doi:10.1093/mnras/sts491. |
| [54] | U.V.S. Seshavatharam, Physics of Rotating and Expanding Black Hole Universe, Progress in Physics, vol. 2, pp7-14, 2010. |
| [55] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam. The Primordial Cosmic Black Hole and the Cosmic Axis of Evil. International Journal of Astronomy 2012, 1(2): 20-37 DOI: 10.5923/j.astronomy.20120102.02 |
| [56] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. The Reduced Planck’s Constant, Mach’s Principle, Cosmic Acceleration and the Black Hole Universe. Journal of Physical Science and Application (A) 2 (10) (2012) 441- 447 |
| [57] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana.. Quantum Mechanics, Cosmic Acceleration and CMB Radiation. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A) Vol. 12 Issue 4, p.17, (2012). |
| [58] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana, Role of Avogadro number in grand unification. Hadronic Journal. Vol-33, No 5, 2010 Oct. p513. |
| [59] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana, To confirm the existence of atomic gravitational constant. Hadronic journal, Vol-34, No 4, 2011 Aug. p379. |
| [60] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Super Symmetry in Strong and Weak interactions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, Vol.19, No.2, (2010), p.263. |
| [61] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana.. SUSY and strong nuclear gravity in (120-160) GeV mass range. Hadronic journal, Vol-34, No 3, 2011, p.277 |
| [62] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Integral charge SUSY in Strong nuclear gravity. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) p.842. |
| [63] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Nucleus in Strong nuclear gravity. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) p.302. |
| [64] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana.. Atomic gravitational constant and the origin of elementary magnetic moments. Hadronic journal, Vol 33, No 6, 2010 p.655 |
| [65] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana.. Accelerating universe and the expanding atom. Hadronic journal, Vol-35, No 3, 2012 p.271. |
| [66] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana.. Atom, universe and the fundamental interactions. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A) Vol. 12 Issue 5, p.1, (2012). |
| [67] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Is Planck’s constant – a cosmological variable? International Journal of Astronomy 2013, 2(1): 11-15 DOI: 10.5923/j.astronomy.20130201.02. Or Proceedings of 2-nd International Conference on Theoretical Physics. Moscow 2013. pp. 71. |
| [68] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Past, present and future of the Avogadro number. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A) Vol. 12 Issue 7, p.27, (2012). |
| [69] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. To understand the four cosmological interactions. International Journal of Astronomy 2012, 1(5): 105-113 |
| [70] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Hubble volume and the fundamental interactions. International Journal of Astronomy 2012, 1(5): 87-100 DOI: 10.5923/j.astronomy.20120105.03 |
| [71] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Molar electron mass and the basics of TOE. Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics 2012, 2(6): 132-141 DOI: 10.5923/j.jnpp.20120206.01 |
| [72] | N. Bohr. On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules. (Part-2, Systems containing only a Single Nucleus). Philos. Mag. 26, 476, 1913 |
| [73] | N. Bohr. “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules”. (Part-1) Philos. Mag. 26, 1 1913 |
| [74] | J.V. Narlikar, Introduction to cosmology, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002, 393 – 400. |
| [75] | S.N.Bose. Planck’s Law and Light Quantum Hypothesis. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 26, 178. 1924. |
| [76] | Mehra J and Rechenberg H. The Historical development of Quantum theory. Springer Verlog. Chapter-1. 1982. |
| [77] | P.A.M.Dirac. The quantum theory of electron. Proc.Roy.Soc. Lon A117.610,1928. |
| [78] | Hector Javier Durand-Manterola. Dipolar Magnetic Moment of the Bodies of the Solar System and the Hot Jupiters. Planetary and Space Science 57:1405-1411 (2009) |
| [79] | D. Russell Humphreys. The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields. CRSQ Volume 21, Number 3, 1984. |
| [80] | P. Roy Chowdhury et al. Modified Bethe-Weizsacker mass formula with isotonic shift and new driplines. Mod. Phys. Lett. A20 (2005) p.1605-1618 |
| [81] | W. D. Myers et al. Table of Nuclear Masses according to the 1994 Thomas-Fermi Model.(from nsdssd.lbl.gov) |
| [82] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Role of the fine structure ratio in fitting the SEMF energy constants and super heavy magic numbers. Hadronic journal. Vol. 35, No. 1, p.113, 2012. |
| [83] | G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra. The 1993 atomic mass evolution.(I) Atomic mass table. Nuclear physics, A 565, 1993, p1-65. |
| [84] | S. Atashbar Tehrani and A. N. Khorramian. Determination of the strong coupling constant using available experimental data. CPC(HEP & NP), 2010, 34(9): 1485-1487. Vol. 34, No. 9, 2010 |
| [85] | Hidezumi Terazawa. Unified composite model of fundamental particles. KEK-PREPRINT-97-130. Aug 1997. |
| [86] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. Basics of black hole cosmology – first critical scientific review. Physical Science International journal, Vol-4, Issue-6, p.842-879. 2014 |
| [87] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Basics of the decelerating black hole universe. International Journal of Advanced Astronomy, 2 (1) 8-22, (2014) |
| [88] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana, B.V.S.T. Sai. Is red shift an index of galactic‘atomic light emission’ mechanism? International Journal of Physics, Vol. 1, No.3, 49-64, (2013). |
| [89] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. Friedman Cosmology: Reconsideration and New Results, International Journal of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Science. Vol. 1, No. 2, 2014, pp. 16-26. |
| [90] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. On Cosmic Redshift, Temperature, Large Numbers & Absolute Rate of Expansion Prespacetime Journal, Volume 5, Issue 7, pp. 641-657, 2014. |
| [91] | U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. Understanding Black Hole Cosmology and the Cosmic Halt. Journal of Advanced Research in Astrophysics and Astronomy ,Vol.1, Issue 1,1-27, 2014. |
APA Style
U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. (2014). A Brief Report on Hubble Volume, Molar Electron Mass and the Four Cosmological Interactions. International Journal of High Energy Physics, 1(2), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12
ACS Style
U. V. S. Seshavatharam; S. Lakshminarayana. A Brief Report on Hubble Volume, Molar Electron Mass and the Four Cosmological Interactions. Int. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 1(2), 18-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12
AMA Style
U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. A Brief Report on Hubble Volume, Molar Electron Mass and the Four Cosmological Interactions. Int J High Energy Phys. 2014;1(2):18-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12,
author = {U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana},
title = {A Brief Report on Hubble Volume, Molar Electron Mass and the Four Cosmological Interactions},
journal = {International Journal of High Energy Physics},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {18-37},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhep.20140102.12},
abstract = {Basic idea is - current cosmological changes may be reflected in any atom. At any given cosmic time, ‘Hubble length’ can be considered as the gravitational or electromagnetic interaction range. Some cosmologists use the term ‘Hubble volume’ to refer to the volume of the observable universe. With reference to the Mach’s principle and Hubble volume, at any cosmic time, if ‘Hubble mass’ is the product of cosmic ‘critical density’ and the ‘Hubble volume’, then it can be suggested that, each and every point in the free space is influenced by the Hubble mass. Clearly speaking, with Hubble volume and Hubble mass: quantum physics, nuclear physics and cosmic physics can be studied in a unified manner. In this new direction authors noticed some interesting coincidences. With reference to the present atomic and nuclear physical constants, present value of Hubble’s constant is close to (69.5 to 71) km/sec/Mpc. With reference to the microscopic coincidences it is possible to suggest that, current cosmic expansion is saturated and is being stopped by the microscopic physical constants.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Brief Report on Hubble Volume, Molar Electron Mass and the Four Cosmological Interactions AU - U. V. S. Seshavatharam AU - S. Lakshminarayana Y1 - 2014/08/20 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12 T2 - International Journal of High Energy Physics JF - International Journal of High Energy Physics JO - International Journal of High Energy Physics SP - 18 EP - 37 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7448 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20140102.12 AB - Basic idea is - current cosmological changes may be reflected in any atom. At any given cosmic time, ‘Hubble length’ can be considered as the gravitational or electromagnetic interaction range. Some cosmologists use the term ‘Hubble volume’ to refer to the volume of the observable universe. With reference to the Mach’s principle and Hubble volume, at any cosmic time, if ‘Hubble mass’ is the product of cosmic ‘critical density’ and the ‘Hubble volume’, then it can be suggested that, each and every point in the free space is influenced by the Hubble mass. Clearly speaking, with Hubble volume and Hubble mass: quantum physics, nuclear physics and cosmic physics can be studied in a unified manner. In this new direction authors noticed some interesting coincidences. With reference to the present atomic and nuclear physical constants, present value of Hubble’s constant is close to (69.5 to 71) km/sec/Mpc. With reference to the microscopic coincidences it is possible to suggest that, current cosmic expansion is saturated and is being stopped by the microscopic physical constants. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -
Email: